Studies and Issues index
Adjunct faculty member,
the Rev. Dr. Warren Eshbach, provides theological perspective to Dover, PA
intelligent design controversy. Below is the text of his statement at a
public press conference in early November in Harrisburg, PA.
STATEMENT: DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
The situation that brings us here today regarding recent decisions by the Dover Area School District Board centers, in my opinion, around two key issues – one relating to religion and science and the other to religion and governance.
In terms of religion and science, I believe:
that Genesis 1 - 11 was not written as a scientific text book for the 21st century, but was a faith statement about the beginnings of life.
that the God of the Judeo-Christian Bible is far greater than our limited human understanding and perspectives, and constantly challenges us to grow beyond where we have been in our thinking.
that Christians can believe in evolution, without going against their belief in a Creator God. Evolvement of life forms are all around us. The scientific theory of evolution and the theology of intelligent design do not have to be mutually exclusive. The infinite God encompasses both.
“Science studies the pattern; theology assigns the cause.” Austin Farrer (1967)
In terms of religion and governance,
Religion has always played a role in the affairs of our nation and particularly in this commonwealth where freedom of speech and conscience has always been a cornerstone.
The real issue in this current debate in the Dover Area School District is whether decisions which uphold any particular theological belief should be imposed by the Board on persons who cannot conscientiously accept or teach them.
As a result of the school board’s decision, high school science teachers may feel caught between the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision regarding creationism (or by whatever name it goes) and the mandate of their local school board.
In matters of public discourse, the Board could work out differences with dialogue and reason among all parties concerned. In this instance it could include professional teachers, pastors, church leaders, and other taxpayers, but most of all, it must include students. Such a public forum would not only be an educational opportunity on the issues, but also a model for our community on how to listen to differing opinions and come to an informed and enlightened resolution.
Unfortunately, we are here because of what appears to have been a desire for less community involvement and a board’s arbitrary decision based on specific theological and/or political perspectives.
As one who believes in reconciliation, it is not too late for the Dover School Board to reconsider and give itself more time to consider a solution on this issue which can address concerns of all parties. Such reasonableness would be far preferable to legal entanglements which could further fracture the community
