|
Mark Vitalis Hoffman |
|
Questions Raised
How do we judge which on-line resources are worth our time and attention? With a book one is given information about the author (educational/professional credentials), "endorsements" by various scholars and a "forward" by another author, providing additional insight into the author and the book. Since this is most often not the case with on-line resources, I wonder if there is an "established" method accepted by web-smart Biblical scholars that would provide some guidance?
Observations on Surfing - issues regarding Philippians & the surfing exercise
472,000 hits – how do I narrow it down without missing something of value?
When you "click" on a site it doesn’t take you to your specific search parameter but to a page on or from which you must search further. For example, searching to see if there was a Philippians commentary by Luther I was led to http://www.textweek.com/pauline/phil2.htm - Luther’s Sermon on Threefold Righteousness. Other sites seemed totally unrelated or too confusing. (Did Luther write a Philippians commentary? I couldn’t find it on Luther’s Works.)
"Matthew Henry (1662-1714) was a Welsh-born, English nonconformist minister and Bible commentator. He is remembered for his…multi-volume Exposition of the Old and New Testaments which is still published … He lived to complete it only as far as to the end of the Acts; but after his death certain non-conformists prepared the Epistles and Revelation from Henry's manuscripts." http://www.wholesomewords.org/biography/bhenry.html
If I had not researched Matthew Henry I would not have known that he had not written the commentary on Philippians, but that "certain non-conformists" used his manuscripts in preparation. That seems like it would have been important to know, but this was not mentioned anywhere that I could find on the crosswalk.com website (see #5 below).
Most Interesting Information
1. The Christian Classics Ethereal Library website on Calvin’s commentary on Philippians because it is hard for me to imagine that this is all Calvin felt was worth saying - nothing about the Christ Hymn or Kenosis, or the great joy expressed despite Paul’s imprisonment; not much of substance. http://www.ccel.org/c/calvin/comment3/comm_vol42/htm/iv.htm#_fnf9
2. Brownie Points
Site Where I Spent the Most Time
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Commentaries/MatthewHenryComplete/mhc-com.cgi?book
Issues regarding Philippians for Class Discussion
The following is from the Matthew Henry Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible - Chapter 1
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Commentaries/MatthewHenryComplete/mhc-com.cgi?book
Chapter 1 -- "Observe, I. The persons writing the epistle - Paul and Timotheus. Though Paul was alone divinely inspired, he joins Timothy with himself, to express his own humility, and put honour upon Timothy." …
"Those who are aged, and strong, and eminent, should pay respect to, and support the reputation of, those who are younger, and weaker, and of less note."
The first notation seems to suggest that Timothy could not himself been inspired by God for ministry? If we truly believe in the "priesthood of all believers" and in each person’s baptismal call/vocation – it seems to me that Timothy had his own "divine inspiration" (I never had the impression that Paul would have thought this way either.)
The second observation is interesting to reflect on in view of age/experience/partnership in ministry (& at seminary)
Chapter 4 -- "It seems, there were women who laboured with Paul in the gospel; not in the public ministry (for the apostle expressly forbids that, 1 Tim. 2:12, I suffer not a woman to teach), but by entertaining the ministers, visiting the sick, instructing the ignorant, convincing the erroneous. Thus women may be helpful to ministers in the work of the gospel"
The author apparently holds to Pauline authorship of 1 Timothy and thus makes judgments about the role of the women in Philippians based on the Pastoral Letters. Considering ordination of women is questioned using texts such as the Pastorals, is there a way to talk about inter-textual issues on this topic without teaching an entire course on the disputed epistles?